Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivtsev Vrazhek Street
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 20:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sivtsev Vrazhek Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete unref'd article about a "small one-way street", likely nn. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, unfortunately. The street is rather notable among Moscow streets, but the article is too short. I can try enhancing it using the sources cited in ru.wikipedia article, but it wouldn't be a disaster to delete it in the meantime. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Delete Unless it can be expanded. ReverendG (talk) 02:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note-- Translated version of the ru.wikipedia.--Jmundo (talk) 04:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The Russian article mentions so many notable buildings that I'd call the street notable for it's cultural significance. Unfortunately it does need to be expanded to indicate this, but the russian article mentions no references. - Mgm|(talk) 11:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nearly everything in en "article" is incorrect. It is not small by downtown standards; it is not in the "inmost" center (what is it?) and it's not parallel to Arbat Street. There are plenty of printed books on the subject that make this "definition" unnecessary. NVO (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Oh, and completeley forgot: it's not a street. It's a pereulok - translated as lane/sidestreet/alley. NVO (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article has been expanded tremendously since the AfD began, with references. Even delete "voters" have termed this "notable". --Oakshade (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--Article has improved since the last delete argument. There was never any question about the notability of the subject.--Jmundo (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, totally. The street is an important location in Moscow and the article is completely different now. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to saving efforts by NVO. --Russavia Dialogue 19:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.