Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Fisher Ames

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Fisher Ames (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the U.S. Senate website, "Frustratingly little is known about the life and career of Sarah Fisher Ames..." It seems her only claims to notability are creating some busts of Abraham Lincoln and opening a hospital during the Civil War. That doesn't seem like enough to pass WP:N. Maybe I'm wrong, if someone can expand this here, I will withdraw my nom. South Nashua (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep demonstrates WP:GNG. The current article doesn't have the best sources. But a quick Google search makes some great suggestions that will improve it:

MassiveEartha (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough. I still think she's borderline on notability, but there might be hope for improvement beyond this addition as well. I personally wasn't sure. In hindsight, a PROD probably would have been better here. South Nashua (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, as above. I'm taken by the likelihood that Ames was the instigator of (arguably) the most famous portrait of Lincoln: The Interminable, Everlasting Lincolns (Part 1). —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 15:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.